Media Appearances

Almost Nobody Got Laid Off Last Week

Trend Macrolytics writes in a note to clients:

Stunning. The lowest new claims number since 1969, when the labor force was only half as big as it is now… And one more thing — in our earnings season surprise-factor update, we are thrilled to tell you that with 106 of 500 companies reported, this is by multiples the best earnings season in history, despite the rampant upgrade surge we’ve experienced over the prior quarter.

Trump-Vance Productivity Boom Threatened by Trump, Vance

Don Luskin at Trend Macrolytics points out that the combination of fewer federal workers and President Donald Trump’s enforcement of immigration law means that the total number of hours worked in the U.S. has actually been declining lately. Mr. Luskin writes in a note to clients today:

"Immigration explained something like two thirds of the job gains from mid-2022 through early 2025, and now it has stopped, indeed it has been running to some extent in reverse. Over the last twelve months, it’s probably been responsible for something like 100,000 outright job losses through deportation that went unreplaced by new immigrants, and had to be made up by absorbing new native-born entrants into employment – only about 65,000 per month, given the age demographics."

Yet as Mr. Luskin explains, people who are still working in the U.S. are getting a lot done lately:

"Over the last four quarters, real private sector output is up 3.39%… How is that possible without more people in more jobs working more hours making the economy bigger? How can we be producing so much more honey without more bees? You know the answer – productivity. Productivity = growth in output per hours worked. Fewer hours. More output… Productivity growth over the last four quarters has been 3.44%. The average over the history of the data is 2.25%. With more honey being produced without more bees, individual bees get wealthier."

A New Era for the Federal Reserve

Mr. Warsh has written about a new version of the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord that left fiscal policy to the Treasury while letting the central bank focus on monetary matters.

Don Luskin nearby offers one way the two institutions could collaborate in a new Accord to shrink the balance sheet, but there are others. Mr. Warsh isn’t likely to get too specific in Tuesday’s hearing, but the direction he sets will be important. His relationship with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will be crucial to pulling this transition off, and by all accounts they get along well.

The Unending Trump Tariff Mess

The larger reality is that Mr. Trump is so bull-headed about tariffs that he’s going to re-impose them any way he can. Along with Section 122, he’ll fire up more Section 201, 301 and 232 (national security) studies and tariffs. But as our friend Don Luskin points out, these are pea shooters compared to the IEEPA tariffs the Court struck down. They are limited in scope and duration.

SCOTUS on Tariffs

Don’t miss this critical conversation. Join our expert panel as we unpack the latest US Supreme Court decision on tariffs. We’ll go beyond the headlines to examine what it means for economic growth, inflation, geopolitics and, most importantly, possible investment impact.

Another Nice Surprise for the U.S. Economy

Trend Macrolytics responds to the news in a note to clients that emphasizes the value of businesses investing in capital expenditures, known as capex:

New orders for non-defense capital goods (ex-aircraft) makes a new all-time high. Orders are the precursor of capex. Capex is the precursor of growth. We’re in a new productivity supercycle. It’s official.

Trump Tries Forceful Persuasion

Don Luskin and Michael Warren at Trend Macrolytics write in a note to clients: "It will take a lot to rehabilitate Venezuela’s depreciated oil infrastructure, but in the meantime, diverting its heavy crude exports to the US would severely disrupt Canada’s and Russia’s exports and China’s imports — giving Trump important leverage in trade and other negotiations."

Donald Luskin on the Journal Editorial Report with Paul Gigot

A new productivity supercycle began in the pandemic during Q2-2020, and will continue in 2026 and likely for another twenty years. AI is already being adopted by businesses large and small, because its human interface is simple enough for anyone to use. It will be adopted both from the top-down and the bottom-up, starting in narrow specialty fields like computer programming (where, already, fewer workers are producing far more output) and broad fields like education and health care. Workers will initially be displaced, but AI will create whole new industries to re-employ them.

Luskin: Tariffs Hurt Growth & Cause Recessions, Supreme Court Ruling Could Change Everything

Donald L. Luskin explains how the Supreme Court reversing tariffs could be a huge gift to the S&P 500 as refunds hit corporate balance sheets. However, he says the market mostly does not expect this to happen. He believes that America needs to grow its way out of its deficit, and we can’t do that with higher taxes. Therefore, he argues that tariffs, a form of tax, are hurting American growth.

Luskin: Miran’s Fed Appointment ‘Very, Very Dangerous’ for Markets

Donald Luskin says a potential Stephen Miran-led Federal Reserve would be "very, very dangerous" for markets, citing Miran's reportedly radical views on devaluing the U.S. dollar. Luskin also weighs in on the jobs picture, attributing recent weak job numbers to a decline in immigration rather than a recessionary economy. Despite concerns about inflation, Luskin thinks it's a "solved problem" and sees the $262 billion in new tax cuts from the "one big beautiful bill" as a major positive for the market.

Don Luskin on the Journal Editorial Report with Paul Gigot

Trump’s latest threat to fire Powell is just another trick to get your attention, with the Supreme Court having virtually said he can’t do it. Powell is only one vote anyway. Warsh has thrown his hat in the ring to replace Powell, with a mixed message of dovish rate cuts and hawkish quantitative tightening. The economy doesn’t need rate cuts – with unemployment and inflation at target, the current funds rate must be about neutral. Stocks have shrugged off tariff scares, but they would likely be higher without those scares. Trump has been negotiating against himself, and has gotten no trade deals. Now, within weeks, the case against Trump’s IEEPA tariffs will go to the Supreme Court, where the tariffs will likely be struck down unanimously. Trump will come back with smaller, narrower tariffs that will seem like nothing.

Don Luskin on the Journal Editorial Report with Paul Gigot

TrendMacro CIO Donald Luskin argues that the oil market has been generously pre-supplied by OPEC, as though they anticipated the conflict between Israel and Iran. He dimisses the US/China trade "deal" as no deal at all, only a climb-down from mutual assured destruction. He expects the Supreme Court will strike down what's left of Trump's tariffs. Will tariffs be inflationary? They've already started to bite, at $70 billion year-to-date. But no inflation, just as there was no inflation in 2018 and 2019 when tariffs were last imposed.

Signs of a Weaker Labor Market

…Our friend Don Luskin of Trend Macro notes another concern, which is two months in a row of shrinking foreign-born employment. Leaving aside the legal and other problems with Joe Biden’s border failures, there’s no doubt that immigrant labor buoyed the job market over his Presidency. That seems to be going into reverse, as you’d expect with the Trump Administration’s crackdown.

In the four months of Trump II, Mr. Luskin calculates that the immigrant population has shrunk by 773,000, or 193,000 a month. Fewer immigrants mean fewer workers to fill job openings, so there will be a cost in future growth from the Trump Administration’s border closure and deportation roundups…

Luskin: Mag 7 is Disproportionately Dragging Down Market

Don Luskin notes that if you strip out the Mag 7 from the S&P 500, “the S&P 493 remains unchanged!” He stresses, “Things aren’t as bad as they feel.” He thinks the Supreme Court could overturn Trump’s tariffs and says he’s not a fan of tariffs in general, as they’re just another form of tax. However, putting them in context, he argues that Trump’s proposed tax cuts outweigh the costs of the tariffs. He also covers the Fed and what he thinks Powell will do next.

Tariffs Matter More Than Don Luskin Thinks

Donald Luskin argues that tariffs are “inherently small tax hikes because tariffs only apply to, at most, a base of $3.257 trillion—the total value of goods and services the U.S. imports annually” (“How Much Do Tariffs Matter?,” op-ed, Jan. 29).

Yet they apply more widely than that. Tariffs make cars and housing more expensive, for example, even when they are made with American steel. When President Trump raised steel tariffs in 2018, Cleveland-Cliffs and U.S. Steel raised their prices, too, largely because they could get away with it. Reducing competition is the point of many tariffs.

This does, however, reinforce Mr. Luskin’s argument that tariffs are poor revenue raisers. Governments collect only a fraction of the higher prices that consumers pay thanks to tariffs. Much of the rest is corporate welfare.

Tariffs Are Tricky Variables

In “How Much Do Tariffs Matter?” (op-ed, Jan. 29), Donald Luskin claims that tariffs have little effect because he observes little change in inflation rates, gross-domestic-product growth and federal deficits after the introduction of President Trump’s tariffs in 2018.

Yet these economic metrics are influenced by a variety of factors, and we don’t live in a static world in which tariffs are the only variable. Studies have consistently proved that tariffs are inflationary, and if inflation in Mr. Luskin’s observations was unchanged following the introduction of tariffs, then perhaps the only logical conclusion is that inflation would otherwise have gone down in the absence of tariffs.

Energy costs go ‘way beyond inflation’: Don Luskin

TrendMacro chief investment officer Don Luskin discusses the economic struggles hitting various industries under the Biden-Harris administration on 'The Evening Edit.'

Stock Market Says America Will Be OK

Don Luskin of Trend Macrolytics writes in a note to clients today:

"There have been highly volatile days as the presidential election landscape has chaotically emerged. But stocks have been in a less than 14% trading range despite what remains a maximally uncertain outcome poised at 50/50 in the polls, the prediction markets and the models – with both candidates continually improvising ill-considered economic policy proposals. With stocks at all-time highs as Trump’s polling has recently improved, it may be that markets are signaling a slight preference for Trumponomics. House control is 50/50, also. If Senate control were 50/50, the joint probability of one-party control of government by either party would be 25%."

But Mr. Luskin argues that Senate control isn’t 50/50. In his view Republican Senate control is now assured “with West Virginia and Montana in the bag.” He writes:

"The joint probability of one-party control remains 25%, but it can only be by Republicans. That opens the possibility for the extension of expiring provisions of the 2017 tax cuts. But there remains a 75% probability of gridlock, pointing to general stability of economic policy no matter who wins the presidency."

Sprott Debates #2 – David Rosenberg & Don Luskin

Will the Fed continue to cut? Is there still a possibility of a recession? What’s the trajectory for gold? To tackle these timely questions David Rosenberg and Don Luskin join Ed Coyne and John Hathaway for round two of our Sprott Debate series.

We’re in a correction: Donald Luskin

TrendMacro CIO Donald Luskin discusses the sell-off as recession fears spark turmoil throughout the global markets.

Mass Deportation Would Be a Disaster

A low fertility rate means fewer young adults entering the workforce to replace retirees, leading to labor shortages—unless immigration makes up the difference. In a recent analysis published in these pages, TrendMacro CEO Donald Luskin estimated that foreign-born people represent 80% of the adult-population increase in the U.S. since July 2022 and account for 71% of the 2.5 million new jobs. Without these workers, he estimated, the economy would have grown “less than a third as much as it actually has.”

US inflation is a ‘statistical aberration’: Donald Luskin

Trend Macrolytics founder and CIO Donald Luskin argues interest rates are not restrictive on a 'booming' economy and that short-term traders currently have 'viable' market options.

Chris Farrell: Productivity growth has led to our economic growth

A "fireside chat" with Donald Luskin, founder of TrendMacro, at the recent CFA Society of Minnesota annual dinner reminded me of the importance of paying attention to productivity. (There was no fireplace but a colorful bouquet of flowers instead.) The CFA Society of Minnesota is one of the oldest chapters of the CFA Institute, issuer of the chartered financial analyst designation.

During his remarks, Luskin made a compelling case for inflation turning into mild deflation — a decline in the overall price level — later this year. He also stressed in his analysis why improvements in productivity weren't ephemeral after emerging from the dramatic economic trauma of the pandemic. In addition to the workforce and business investment gains achieved during the pandemic disruption, he sees the rise of artificial intelligence boosting productivity in the long haul.

Why 37 Votes = A Hung Electoral College, a Contingent Election and the 7th Party System

The best analysis of this possibility to date is by my old friend Donald Luskin at TrendMacro whose nouse on these matters has always been excellent. On February 8th, his team released a report called How Biden and Trump Can Both Lose. Easily. For months, he has said that there is a 50:50 chance of a contingent election, but now he goes much further and says it’s becoming a central scenario.

Rate cuts are coming soon: Don Luskin

TrendMacro chief investment officer Don Luskin analyzes the Federal Reserve's moves to regulate the economy on 'Making Money.'

Economist predicts ‘deflation is coming,’ which will cause the Fed to ‘scramble’

Ahead of the December meeting, one economist argued the Federal Reserve's "dangerously high" interest rate hikes are transitory, and that the Fed will make cuts in the first quarter of next year.

On "Mornings with Maria," Monday, TrendMacro CIO Donald Luskin explained his frustration with the Fed's rate hike campaign and his economic outlook. 

"Please, please, please, can we all stop listening to Jay Powell? Please. Mr. Inflation is transitory. He is still so embarrassed about that one. He's now insisting that his dangerously high-interest rates are not transitory. Oh, they will be," Luskin said. "Inflation is collapsing and he knows it. It's turning into deflation like I warned last time we talked. There will be rate cuts in Q1."

US economy needs deflation now: Don Luskin

TrendMacro Chief Investment Officer Don Luskin explains how deflation can help fix the government's inflation problem on 'Making Money.'

US fiscal spending on the rise again

TrendMacro Chief Investment Officer Don Luskin provides insight on the Federal Reserve's moves on 'Making Money.'

Charles Payne: We saw the wheels of justice this week

FOX Business host Charles Payne and TrendMacro chief investment officer Don Luskin weigh in on the Sam Bankman-Fried saga and term limits for officials on 'Making Money.'

Why is wage growth slowing?

TrendMacro chief investment officer Don Luskin gives his take on businesses throwing in the towel on 'Making Money.'

Money Supply and Inflation

Inflation has everyone’s attention. In this podcast, economist and financial analyst Don Luskin explains to IPI’s Merrill Matthews why the rapid increase in the money supply caused the inflation. And the declining money supply means inflation is on its way down.

Inflation Proves Stubborn in January

…the sharp decline in the money supply that began last year will lead to rapid disinflation in the coming months and perhaps a recession. Wall Street forecaster Ed Hyman of Evercore ISI and Don Luskin of Trend Macro are anticipating similar inflation declines and are warning about the risk of recession. They note that Milton Friedman said monetary policy works with “long and variable lags” of a year or two.

Gambling Is Not the Future

Regarding Donald Luskin’s op-ed “The Feds Don’t Want You Betting on Elections” (Nov. 2): Listed futures contracts must serve some commercial purpose, such as hedging grain or currencies. A futures contract for $2 on Backfire in the third race at Pimlico, however, would be gambling. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is saying that electoral futures are gambling, not commercial.

Result of Poor Municipal Leadership

Mr. Luskin founded a company, Trend Macrolytics, after a long and distinguished career in the investment sector of the economy… Three years ago, Mr. Luskin relocated his business to Dallas from Chicago… As Luskin says you can see it in their eyes. He told me "When there is opportunity, upward mobility, the way people act accelerates that opportunity into a virtuous cycle. When there is upward mobility, everyone you meet might be someone who can help you move up, so you are always nice, always positive, always helpful, always respectful, always putting your best foot forward. That attitude creates bonds of commitment and trust that are essential to the environment of opportunity. It is therefore a self-fulfilling prophecy. The opposite is true too. When people think there is no opportunity, they act rude, bitter, resentful, untrusting. Even if there were opportunity, that would destroy it."  

It is a privilege to work: Donald Luskin

TrendMacro chief investment officer shreds President Joe Biden's comments on record-high inflation and weighs in on government programs on 'Making Money with Charles Payne.'